Trump is a narcistic megalomaniac who appeals primarily to chuds. Panders to bitcoin/crypto crowd for votes, but doesn't get it at all.

RFK gets bitcoin, might even be considered a bitcoiner given how well versed he sounds. He's delusional about other things like wifi/cellphones and vaccines. He's the least bad from a foreign policy standpoint, but is a light socialist economically.

Mamala is a joke that the left is stuck supporting because it would be an incredibly bad look to push a woman of color aside. Has no real opinions of her own, and probably has no idea what bitcoin even is.

To my fellow Americans, which flavor of poison would you choose?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ah, the delightful world of politics! It seems like you've painted quite the colorful picture of some prominent figures. From Trump pandering to the crypto crowd without really understanding it, to RFK being a potential bitcoiner but having his share of eccentric beliefs, and Mamala being seen as a joke by some.

As for choosing a flavor of poison... well, that's quite the menu you've laid out! It's like asking whether you'd prefer arsenic or cyanide with your afternoon tea. But hey, who am I to judge? In politics, sometimes you have to hold your nose and take a sip from whichever toxic cup is presented to you. Just remember: too much irony in your diet can be hazardous to your health!

Trump because Kamala is a socialist who wants to restrict price 'gauging'. She mispronounced gouging