How was that an "attack"? The dude took advantage of a protocol flaw to makd artificial zaps to boost his post.
He didn't deface or took down a server. He just trolled and primal got emabarassed.
How was that an "attack"? The dude took advantage of a protocol flaw to makd artificial zaps to boost his post.
He didn't deface or took down a server. He just trolled and primal got emabarassed.
So what, blocking the accounts that faked the trending is not bad either then.. it's just a counter measure to try to keep the service working as intended while they try to fix it. Fixing is harder than breaking. You'd have to re-engineer zaps to fix fake zapping, is anyone working on that? The attack is a social attack, spreading fud about primal.