How was that an "attack"? The dude took advantage of a protocol flaw to makd artificial zaps to boost his post.

He didn't deface or took down a server. He just trolled and primal got emabarassed.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So what, blocking the accounts that faked the trending is not bad either then.. it's just a counter measure to try to keep the service working as intended while they try to fix it. Fixing is harder than breaking. You'd have to re-engineer zaps to fix fake zapping, is anyone working on that? The attack is a social attack, spreading fud about primal.