nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m yo dude, sats is the standard.

It’s cool, I get it, you’re trying something to help adoption, but seriously sats is the way.

People get it, it’s intuitive, 6000 bitcoins for a coffee is not, everyone already gets that 1 bitcoin is worth more than their yearly salary, so that’s confusing. Says they get, cuz dollars got cents too.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's a question of UX design and I like it. Do whatever you want in your app

No shit, the point of the post is I don’t care if you like it, it’s confusing to new participants.

Need to check with new users so I do not have the data but I think new participants are smarter than we think

Just use “sats” until the Unicode symbol is established.

3 extra characters (that can be any size) surely can’t break your design especially considering half of a square terminal is empty space at that point of the transaction.

It makes Bitcoin seem like a scam when people use the word Bitcoins to refer to sats.

It makes Bitcoin seem like a scam when people use the word Bitcoins to refer to sats.

Jack doesn’t do what’s best for Bitcoin… he does what’s best for another B-word… his bottom-line

Enabling bitcoin payments with no fees to millions of terminals, contributing resources to create to competitive mining hardware, introducing new hardware wallet options, are all good for bitcoin.

Don’t let your personal opinions of an individual color their contributions to bitcoin, because those things are all objectively good for bitcoin.

Be cool

I agree. People understand dollars and cents so they should easily be able to understand bitcoin and sats.