Replying to Avatar Smith

Total amounts in zaps can still be public if the recipient wants to, but the zap sender should be private unless they make themselves public
Avatar
Michael Anton Fischer 2y ago

No. The purpose of the zap is to interact. Obfuscation of the sender by default breaks the whole concept.

Anon zaps as option is perfect.

But that’s my opinion. Go build a client that has it as a default.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

80
80f48f5e... 2y ago

That is also the purpose of the like button

Avatar
Smith 2y ago

As you alluded to there will be apps for both options so it will be a users choices which will keep everyone happy