I somehow disagree with your disagreement. If you have a Bugatti and live in a mansion, no one really knows how much exactly you have. They might break into your house and rob some stuff or your car but most of your wealth is probably somehow protected, in banks, real estate and other financial third parties or instruments. Hard to get to those!

And while I agree that Bitcoin has the property of being unconfiscatable, you don’t want to be in a position where you are a target. There are stories from the UK, Canada and Sweden among others, where criminals broke in, tied down people for hours and finally got ahold of seed phrases, access to wallets, etc.

It’s easy to think we are all tough guys, ready to defend what’s ours (we should be!) but it might be a different story when you have a family to protect and a bunch of violent guys decide to pay you a visit.

Don’t wanna scare anybody with this, we should be out building community, spreading the Bitcoin wonders and teaching to those who are ready for it, but a little bit of prudence and privacy in managing your wealth should be encouraged.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Don't get me wrong -- I am 100 percent for prudence and not making yourself a target, but whether you have 20 million or 100 million dollars really doesn't matter to someone trying to rob you. You're obviously rich and have stuff they want.

And I'm not against coinjoining if you want to, only the ethos on this site that you should hide your identity to post anything, hide your interest in freedom tech and freedom money because otheriwse you're a target.

It's not really freedom tech IMO if you have to hide.

Also, why aren't people robbing Saylor? Because they assume he has a custody solution that makes him unrobbable. I think that's something to normalize too.

Correct! Or all the other prominent and very public Bitcoiners who are easier to meet than Saylor. Make yourself unrobbable with a custody solution that fits your case.