This.

Or if relays start caring, or being made to care.

Relays do a pretty diligent job of taking down reported content. Happily, no operator seems to have taken seriously the most recent incarnation of Reportinator, and we all need to make sure it stays that way...

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Clients and relays are going to do whatever their developers/operators choose to do, regardless of Reportinator or anything else.

There is nothing the collective “we” can do to stop anyone from making content reports, labels, or prevent anyone else from using them.

If your client or relay does something you don’t like, use a new one. That’s the value of the protocol.

Well if it's a paid relay, then leaving seems like a waste in that scenario, unless you get a refund.

Some work on subscription models, so you can just not renew.

Sucks if you paid for the year only to find out your notes are getting censored.

nostr:npub18kzz4lkdtc5n729kvfunxuz287uvu9f64ywhjz43ra482t2y5sks0mx5sz I think it's only fair that people know that if they are using paid relays for premium service, that they EXPLICITLY know which relays are using 'Reportinator'/Microsoft moderation API to censor them, don't you?

Does wine interact with any of those relays?

No

Hardly anyone does.

I subscribe to wine and many other relays, including my own, and can't see this bot.

> "There is nothing the collective “we” can do to"

Hold it right there, buddy. You just posted cringe.

We can do a lot.

In the NIP's themselves regulations were brought up as a reason why this was necessary. Not even joking.

"Kind-1984". My hat off to whichever dev gave snitching that name.

I love Nostr :D

pretty sure it was fiatjaf, he's got that kind of sense of humor

It's too 'on the nose' for my liking.

it's definitely a gfy to censorious baby panderers tho