6969 sat reward for anyone who digs up meaningful dirt on Greenpeace. 696 sats to anyone who digs up questionable dirt.
Example 1: Greenpeace loses $5 million of donations in a “bad currency bet.”
Example 2: Greenpeace takes $5 million to spread anti-Bitcoin propaganda from Ripple executive chairman Chris Larsen
#GreenpeaceOfShit 
Well, I was trying to find a link to the article Daniel referenced in his post, and saw in the Culture section back in 2014 that GreenpeaceUS had started accepting Bitcoin for donations...
Alphazeta has a good twitter thread on this walker. You've probably seen it
This bloke might be useful to you, a defector if you will:
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1020485.Patrick_Albert_Moore
Activists from Greenpeace and Unmute Gaza have joined forces
Jan 24th
You think they got those climbing ropes set up without permission 🤔 more deepstate bullshit to distract the sheep 🐑
https://video.nostr.build/1916254862942b8425bd31f3d6ae7a0f401c6fa106ca32d2903c16b765b21268.mp4
Nice!
I have been a member of Greenpeace UK for about 30 years and have been involved in direct action, protest and general civil disobedience in their name for a corresponding period of time. In short, I have earned my stripes.
I am also a bitcoiner.
As a consequence, I have had protacted correspondence with them (Greenpeace UK) and local campaign groups regarding their attitude (and in my view acquiescence) to Greenpeace USA's Change The Code campaign.
Here's what I've gleaned...
They are horrified and profoundly embarrassed that Greenpeace US have violated Greenpeace's founding principle of financial independence. This is born out by the staggering lack of support for the campaign by Greenpeace globally.
They recognise that bitcoin is a decentralised monetary network and that therefore lobbying is not only pointless but against the direct-action history of the organisation that gave the world the Rainbow Warrior. If they wanted to change the code, they fucking would.
They are understandably concerned about the energy usage of bitcoin but recognise that the "boiling the oceans" narrative is not evidentially supported. They are also aware of the growing counternarrative that bitcoin is a powerful carbon mitigation technology, stabiliser of renewable intermittency on the grid and offers strong incentives against deforestation in the global south. Their attitude is currently one of wait and see how it plays out; there are bigger fish to fry.
They understand that miners are simply data centres and that there is no sound basis for stigmatising one use for data centres over others. The carbon footprint of streaming services and LLMs is of far more concern to them at this current time, although I suspect any campaign will include the carbon footprint or all and everything we do online.
Greenpeace are coming, and to echo Mr Saylor, they are our friends, they just don't know it yet.
Greenpeace are run by communists.
Trust me bro.
i used to be friends with a guy who declined to work for them and preferred his job as manager of the aviation safety bureau back in 2000, he didn't get a good vibe off them at all, nothing's changed
ecofascism is a cult promoted by banksters, and you won't change my mind, it's always been that, and they have been inserting memes into popular culture since at least the 70s to try and sell their engineered poisons
This was pretty informative.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=E5K5i5Wv7jQ&pp=ygUacG9kY2FzZSBncmVlbnBlYWNlIGZvdW5kZXI%3D
This why you never donate to charity
Lesson : Don’t bet against bitcoin
Greenpeace... just a puppet.
Easy nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u
Here you go, the guy was lucky german police is anything but trigger happy (says a lot about terrorist prevention probabilities)
