It's by no means easy but one verifies authenticity with tools (e.g. metadata) or multiple people who do know better. In these days as we're being molded by bullshit in every step we're also getting better at spotting whether the material has been crafted to provoke a specific end/reaction in contrast to casual information.

For more ambiguous yet seemingly important stuff, it needs a thorough check for contradictions and how well it ties with other factual information.

One thing about actual knowledge is that it rarely contradicts what's already known/established and instead adds to the whole picture to provide a better/more holistic view.

In short, truth is way easier to verify while its impossible to do that with bullshit since its a thing of its own.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yea good points. A good old low tech solution and some investigative journalism sounds like the way to go... if only we still had proper journalists and publications on this planet...

fiat has made lies and large scale crime profitable, bitcoin is doing the same for truth, we just haven't found the appropriate/sustainable models that work at scale with this yet but its just a matter of trial and error (and perhaps some luck or proper timing, too)