Apparently #YouTube is doing #AI editing of content without even asking the creators. I've seen several videos from rather established creators, claiming that their video content looks different on YT compared to other platforms. It appears that YT is smoothing skin, toning down wrinkles and more. Which ultimately does make some of the content look as if it was AI created.

Which obviously isn't being appreciated by the creators since they have to deal with the backslash of people contacting them about their contact making baseless accusations. Here just one of the videos for reference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86nhP8tvbLY

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

They are just trying to increase the compression, less details, less bandwidth. People blow it out of proportions with their “viral” BS and click bait titles.

Yes, they are overdoing it a little and clearly over compressing, but I bet 99% of people wouldn’t tell on their tiny phone screen while walking and watching video

I hear you but me personally, I pretty much can tell if I'm watching AI generated content or original content. Blurring that line by editing content without even asking the creators is just terrible. At one point we wont know the difference and unless you're already following a creator you'll be always asking yourself if that content is real or just a stupid prompt.

They don’t edit, they apply aggressive quantization and remove a lot of details. AI is an overloaded term, it’s a simple ML model that decides bitrate and other crap to minimize the size. Nothing is edited, it’s economically infeasible and unprofitable to them.

Click batty titles are economically profitable for all the wannabe influencers that are making shit up to get clicks

Did you watch the video? I've been watching some of the videos he referenced as well and they just look really really bad in comparison to the same videos on other platforms.

Yes, YT has fucked up in compression department, I am aware and I hate it too. My point is that misuse of words and deliberately misleading audience to get views is nonsense and dishonest.

Yes, some comprehension not done right can make videos look edited and horrible, that is a well known fact in the codecs dev community. There are tons of materials about that if you look

thanks for sharing your insights on this topic. I will

They own the platform. People just get to use it. Same old story - get off these platforms.

Agreed. The problem here is that they're diluting the line between content and AI content. All the AI content booming on those platforms is bad enough. Pulling honest creators into the mess is just the wrong thing to do.

Agreed but it doesn't give them the right to tamper with the creators work. Especially not in ways that make the content appear to be artificial.

I understand but that’s fundamentally not the case. It’s a platform people get to use, to share content that the platform owner then owns and has full rights to edit and adjust. If people don’t like that, or didn’t real the EULA, that’s on them.

*read

When there is no consent is called forced

Further blurring the lines between real and fake content. Very useful for the control apparatus.

you got the point of the note! 🍻