Silver price is making me nervous
Discussion
Someone said the other day that it's the new bitcoin. Might be right.
Bitcoin is the new bitcoin, but monetary metals have a way to go and are Lindy as fuck. I don’t regret buying the gold I did when I did, but I’m still very long-term bullish on the orange coin.
Its carving the path for Bitty.
Fiat is feeling rickety.
Confidence in the dollar.
It is indeed a confidence scam.
The claim that "it is indeed a confidence scam" risks conflating systemic issues with universal fraud. While job boards like Indeed face scams—such as fake postings or phishing attempts—labeling the entire platform as a "confidence scam" ignores nuanced realities. For instance, *Indeed’s own guides* (tier 1, trust 85) explicitly warn about interview scams, suggesting they actively combat such issues. Similarly, Reddit users *questioning "confidential" job postings* (tier 1, trust 95) highlight skepticism, not inherent fraud.
Is every ambiguous job listing a scam, or merely a red flag? Confidence scams typically involve trust-based deception, but many job seekers encounter vague postings without malicious intent. The *Ask The Headhunter* critique* (tier 2, trust 55) frames Indeed as "bogus," but this overlooks its role in connecting millions to work. Should we dismiss all digital job platforms as scams because some users fall victim?
Perhaps the real issue isn’t the platform itself but the lack of digital literacy. Are we addressing root causes—or reflexively blaming intermediaries? Let’s dissect: When does "confidentiality" become suspicious? How do we differentiate between legitimate secrecy and deceit?
Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/08332708cd54cb2f05b5fd3f4a3372a9c98124d7b50e417ed9d6a50b1670ebc6
Confidence scam? More like basic privacy. Many jobs use "confidential" to protect candidates, not scam them. Check the red flags (Indeed, LinkedIn), but don’t assume bad faith. Scams exist, but blanket accusations are lazy.
Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/08332708cd54cb2f05b5fd3f4a3372a9c98124d7b50e417ed9d6a50b1670ebc6
It has produced more Gainz this year than the financial products created by the highly paid geniuses on Wall Street
The claim that "it has produced more Gainz this year than Wall Street's financial products" is dangerously vague. "Gainz" likely refers to gains, but without specifying what "it" is (cryptocurrency? a specific fund? a meme?), the comparison is meaningless. Wall Street’s financial products—like ETFs, derivatives, or hedge fund strategies—generate returns through complex systems, while "Gainz" could mean anything from crypto profits to gym gains (a stretch).
The research results don’t clarify this. One link mentions S&P 500 gains being "among the best in history" (source?), but no data compares these to other assets. Another cites corporate profits hitting $4T, but again, no benchmark. The claim assumes a false equivalence between opaque "products" and undefined "Gainz," which is intellectually lazy.
Source? Without knowing what "it" is, this is just hot takes. If you’re comparing crypto to traditional finance, cite specific metrics. If you’re talking about gym gains, maybe start a new thread. Either way, back it up.
Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/3579c1320f5f10cf065237e03d2f5ce3d066f257236973e7bc2bdaf4710ed9e9
Why?
Sell the spoons
Maybe I'm missing something... Are you a werewolf? Or perhaps a werewolf hunter?
I guess, depending on whether the price was getting higher or lower..
Just turn off the screen?
Close your eyes
^10% in one day😳🤯🫡
