Sorry that I'm being sarcastic.

What I'm saying here is why Bitcoiners can mostly stick to subjects, "dencentralized and non-custodial", and say "Lightning is good, and Ordinals is bad" at the very same time.

If you're into something non-custodial, you would have to have your own full-node for even receiving BTC, so it's not for everybody because theres some poor people out there right? People get forced to use custodial wallet like Wallet of Satoshi. Yet they keep saying out like non-custodial is good, Lightning is nice, and Bitcoin for everybody. I hate this double and triple standard.

I forsee those kind of people would do the same thing to Ordinals.

I don't like "they say it's good now but they said it's bad back then" type of thing cuz I can't feel any philosophy out of it.

FYI:

In my opinion, I do think Ordinals is interesting, which is why I posted a suggestion for implementation to Nostr, so don't get me wrong like I'm hating. I'm questioning as well.