Yea whatever whatever study this data that. How about we use our own logic some times to make judgements?

How many ppl complain about chemtrials despite the evidence that it’s perfectly harmless?

Ppl will inherently know what feels wrong and right. It’s not fool proof, but it’s almost like we forgot about our own capabilities as individuals when people use some study to fight against what feels natural and logical and inherent.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Good morning Sasha. 🌻

Yes, direct experience first, followed by logic, then thinking about what others are interpreting through their data analysis, for example, is an approach I find helpful in coming to a clearer and deeper understanding.

❓❓❓

Oh yeah, asking questions, and taking time to think about and ask the right questions, as Einstein suggested.

btw, how was it on the par 3? 🏌️⛳

I did terribly first few holes, but was starting to make par by the end. Do you play?

I discovered a wooden shaft club in my grand parents cellar when I was a kid so got fairly decent from about 100 yards. But otherwise not very good at all.

Golf became flog and I haven't been in years.

A nine iron, a bucket of balls, and a green 100 yards away, in the early morning might get me back out on the course, though.

Sounds like a perfect par 3 situation to me 🥹

As a kid I played in a park, one hole, played from different directions. As an 10-11 year old, I caddied one summer and would sneak onto the course very early, before having to carry what I remember being big, heavy golf bags.

With golf for me though, on a par 3, I'd feel the need to at least be shooting par. And for that, I'd probably need to be practicing 1-2 hours per day.

Geez, you got me thinking.

Four!!! 🏌️⛳

Simpler on the court hitting tennis balls. Better exercise. No practice required.