It’s funny to see people get so heated about mempool policy and then look at this.
Discussion
Which is precisely the point, what’s the problem that needs changing again?
RIGHT
Remember when the narrative was to give people a hard time for not having their mempool large enough (ok mostly it was just that nostr:nprofile1qqs2fj6373scelx3dvknzuwyvctehmvwr97y8wze3q3mqn0zvm80zyqpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcstsfvj had a smaller mempool than nostr:nprofile1qqsrk63a8wentzpk5ex3eqpf9wtww6vwcddzuh9y2800567n4ulwhpqpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtc4m99ga )?
It's only when mempools are empty that we started people how bad it is to include too much in their mempools (like less than 1 sat/vbyte txs).
Personally, I'd prefer to have my mempool include any transaction that will ultimately make it into a block. But, fortunately, that's up to me.
It's. A. WAR. Daniel.
You get that?? A WAAARRRR 🔥🔥
KNOTS VS CORE WILL MAKE OR BREAK BITCOIN.
Aaaa...nd it died again 😆
It’s a highly regarded debate
I think there’s testing releases that can prove how the mempool would function, have we seen any example?
Stoopid question :
Your point is that fees are very low and blocks are not full, so there isn't much to fight about regarding which transactions to include?
We had a period back in 2023 where blocks were full and fees were off the charts, due to some fairly short-lived activity in NFTs and other dumb trash. I’m not a fan of any of that, but I’m also not a fan of censorship. My take is that a healthy fee market is the best deterrent to spam. To me, Knots is just an exercise in filtration theater. 