The problem with Threads is that it didn’t introduce anything new. It’s just another platform that dilutes the existing social media user base without adding any value.

Once the novelty of NEW wears off, people leave.

Threads combined the concepts of TikTok with Twitter, but did not think through why it may not be a great idea. TikTok is for mindless consumption and Twitter was for learning and discussing ideas. Combined with a userbase made up entirely of visual users (instagram), it perfectly predicts low reply engagement.

People are scrolling their feeds to see images and videos but the platform doesn’t do as good of a job as Instagram or TikTok on that front. And on the opposite spectrum, if you are looking for conversations they simply won’t be there. So you’ve got two sides to this thing and neither is performing as good as competitors. Combine all of that with the natural drop off rates for any new product (old habits die hard) and you lose more than 50% of your users.

Maybe I’m wrong, but I think making Threads Insta-signup-only on launch may have been a giant mistake on Meta’s part.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The problem with threads is that it’s a centralized POS

Thank you for your summary.

Threads had two issues for me personally:

1. It’s too tied up to instagram (obviously)

2. It’s a tamer and “safer” twitter. And this full of brands and boring banality.

I just don’t understand how they expect to have a platform meant for “conversation” when you’re really not allowed to say anything

I’m already afraid to say much other than an emoji on my Instagram captions half the time for fear of a community guidelines violation

😂

True

zuck got the golden goose at the time mobile internet and camera phones blew up

most of the social media of today is built on relics of early 2000s

new social media is just recycled recipies now

a new type of social media is being born and its the decentralized type, anything else is just smoke and mirrors

Well said!