Not sure. They have 50 prisoners. Don't know how much of them are alive. And also dont know how much of them are hostages and how much POW. Civilians are by my standard hostages (on Pierce Morgan has been said around 14) and rest are military personel, so prisoners of war. While hostages (civilians) need to be released right now without conditions, POW is different story and there can be exchange.

But you forgot other side. Israel has also lot of hostages. Hostage is every palestinian who is held in "administrative detention" - a longstanding security policy, inherited from the British, that allows the Israeli state to imprison people indefinitely without charge, and without presenting any evidence against them.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Hamas won’t come to the table. Israel has every right to move at great lengths to get those hostages.

Israel has zero rights to harm civilians.

Israel has every right to go after the hostages.

But not harm civilians. And if they harm them as collaterall damage they need compensate victims.

They take excess measures to avoid civilians. There is no genocide from dropping leaflets to doing door knocks. Compensation occurs after war.

It's just PR stunt for manipulate west to support them while they commit genocide. Not real effort.

If I'm wrong, i can easly be disproven by allowing international journalist into gaza.

Oh right, izrael is one who block access of journalist,how convenient that “innocent” is blocking way to proof his innocence…

You are wrong. They can go through either Israel or Rafah in Egypt.

Can you pls tell it to journalist? The don't know they can get into gaza.

“Israeli authorities have prevented international journalists from entering Gaza since the start of the war, except for brief excursions, tightly controlled by the military.”

https://cpj.org/2025/06/cpj-and-global-media-leaders-call-for-urgent-unrestricted-access-to-gaza-for-journalists/

There are journalists on the front line. I’ve seen the content. And the letter that these article says was written is contradictory, “In addition, the signatories called on Israel to meet its international obligations to protect journalists and immediately allow unrestricted access to Gaza for international media.” Which is it? Let them in or protect them? Again, not a serious argument.

Nice try.

Palestinians journalist exists. So there is no contradiction. Israel killed 179 journalists and media workers and CPJ call for their protection. Allowing access international journalist doesn't mean there are no joirnalists originated from gaza.

How dense can you be? Hamas kills journalists that speak out against them… only one type of journalist exists in Gaza.

This your note is in contradiction with previous.

Because Hamas won’t come to the table.

Hamas is not only one who is not ready to negotiate in good faith.

You have clearly not read history.

We not talk about history, but about curent situation.

This is not somethink which can say minister of government ready to get into table:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/smotrich-says-gaza-to-be-totally-destroyed-population-concentrated-in-small-area/

When you have nazi in government, in israel case mutation of nacism can be called zionazi, for example, you are not ready to negotiate.

Learn to read:

“He told the listening audience that the population of Gaza, some 2.3 million Palestinians, would be “concentrated” in a narrow strip of land between the Egyptian border and the so-called Morag Corridor, which runs the width of Gaza between Khan Younis and the border city of Rafah.

The area would be a “humanitarian” zone, the Religious Zionism leader said, “absent of Hamas and terrorism.”

he describe concentration camp.

You complain when Israel hits too many civilians trying to clean up Hamas and retrieve hostages. You complain when Israel relocates civilians to clean up Hamas and retrieve hostages. You are not a serious person.

No, i complain that representative of genocidal state build concentration camp with unhuman condition where civilians starve to death.

Also in process this process genocidal state steal and destroy private property without compensation from civilians which this state trying eradicate.

Did nazis build concentration camps for protecting civilians? No? Why we need expect anythink different.

If you want evacuate civilians, you need make in humanly. So for example make temporary housing out of gaza, but with full right to return after eradication of hamas with strict timeline. With livable condition (medical care, water, food, shelter,…) And because israel is not trustworthy, it need to by at least under permanent supervision of international organizations.

What zionazi propose is concentration death camp with hunger and ilness instead of gas chambers. Not evacuation of civilians

That policy was not “inherited”.

Relevant part is: “imprison people indefinitely without charge”

That is what hamas do to hostages.