I think these calls are coming from people who have identified either a profitable grift, or a way of imposing anticompetitive regulations. The sound money thesis is practically built on observations that our workforce has become inundated with bullshit jobs that are a parasitic drain on everyone's quality of life. Many things could lead to widespread layoffs, such as a less restrictive regulatory environment, a recession, or hyperbitcoinization, I would not consider the loss of the bullshit jobs to be a net positive for everyone.
⚠️ If this many in the AI industry are concerned, maybe we should listen 🤔
“Dr. Hinton said he has quit his job at Google, where he has worked for more than a decade and became one of the most respected voices in the field, so he can freely speak out about the risks of A.I. A part of him, he said, now regrets his life’s work.”
“But gnawing at many industry insiders is a fear that they are releasing something dangerous into the wild. Generative A.I. can already be a tool for misinformation. Soon, it could be a risk to jobs. Somewhere down the line, tech’s biggest worriers say, it could be a risk to humanity.”
“Until last year, he said, Google acted as a “proper steward” for the technology, careful not to release something that might cause harm. But now that Microsoft has augmented its Bing search engine with a chatbot — challenging Google’s core business — Google is racing to deploy the same kind of technology.”
#OpenAI #AI #DeepMind #ChatGPT
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/01/technology/ai-google-chatbot-engineer-quits-hinton.html
Discussion
Errr, the loss of these jobs would be a net positive.