The #Nostr network should have an option for temporary self-exclusion to combat excessive usage. When a user temporarily excludes themselves, the relay would not allow reading or writing.

nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s nostr:npub1xdtducdnjerex88gkg2qk2atsdlqsyxqaag4h05jmcpyspqt30wscmntxy nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft nostr:npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac

If you are not the right people to receive this suggestion, I apologize in advance. I am not sure who to contact.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Why? Also, isn’t that just unchecking the relay read/write checkboxes?

The idea was to make it impossible for the addict to read/write. An addict, if he knows that he just has to change the checkbox, changes the checkbox and goes back to the addiction. Maybe the idea is absurd !

I dunno, seems very odd. It’s like visiting a casino and asking for a clock on the wall. Just don’t step into the casino 🤷‍♂️

We can add other mechanisms that do a better job anyway (or so I think)

Yes, it's a bit strange. A person diagnosed with addiction cannot simply not enter the casino. Here in Portugal, it is possible to do this in relation to gambling, and casinos are required to not allow entry. Someone who is not addicted does not fully understand this situation.