One of the environmentalist cult's favourite tactic is to frame energy and natural resources as finite and limited, totally disregarding the natural water cycle, the carbon cycle and many other natural cycles.

Take the recent attack on Bitcoin's 'water consumption' for example.

The 'news articles' approach Bitcoin's consumption of water as if it's burning, splitting water atoms for energy. (The process actually requires energy)

When confronted with the issue, people supporting the notion would shift to talking about how there's only a small amount of fresh water in the world and they are essential for all of our survival.

Well yes, only a small percentage of water in the world is 'fresh water', true, true,.... But! Have you ever stop and wondered why that is the case? Have you ever stopped and wondered where all those freshwater came from? Cause it surely is not flowing out from your government's orifice!

And so they would go about promoting all these 'renewable energy' and guess where that energy is from? An actual friggin fireball burning itself up in space!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If water was an issue, we’d build massive desalination plants and capture rainwater everywhere and solve it. We know our species requires it to survive so we would put all resources towards it if it was an actual problem that needed to be addressed.

The climate cultists just fearmonger over bullshit trying to scare people. It works on the weak-willed, particularly naive Boomers and young people who take everything literally.

In the future, If Bitcoin starts to using dark matter energy from the universe, environmentalist may blaming Bitcoin is destroy our universe.