I wonder if you could scale it according to the running cost of sats/vByte to get a tx into the block chain. 🤔
Say you could assign an engagement score for each of the following. What do you think of these weights?
Text reply - 1.0
Reaction - 0.1
10 sats - 1.0
100 sats - 2.0
1000 sats - 3.0 (etc. logarithmically)
Boost - 0.3
Quote reply - 0.6
Multiple of the same type on the same note would diminish exponentially. For example, the first reply would be 1.0; the second, 0.5; the third, 0.25 etc. to avoid counting spam.
#asknostr #nostr #plebchain #grownostr
nostr:nprofile1qqsw2feday2t6vqh2hzrnwywd9v6g0yayejgx8cf83g7n3ue594pqtcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3kamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwvf5hgcm0d9h8qctjdvhxxmmdqyt8wumn8ghj7erpwe5kgtnwdaehgu339e3k7mgxeu5tj nostr:nprofile1qqsvyv8d6dx2tjp33069j2kq2mx7xage6w2upyzvxl4pcegt3t22wyspz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgjwaehxw309aekzarnv9nk2tnc09az7qfqwaehxw309ashqmrpvdjkjmn5dpjhxatw9ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5hsaxvfxr
Discussion
Following the weather of on-chain fees?
Could be cool, but if I lost my database and refetched all the events to recalculate the scores, it would be a pain to work in the block fees again.
My thinking is that this reminds me of wallet developers trying to adjust fee rates before there was a working fee market. Of course that was based on projected block space, and zaps are based on v4v.