Replying to Avatar Jack K

I’m not shifting the discussion to physics arbitrarily, I’m pointing out that Bitcoin gives us an empirical instantiation of quantized time, something physics has never been able to produce.

Objectively, Bitcoin constructs its own timebase through a thermodynamic process of energy and entropy, and that timebase is discrete, quantized, and irreducible. That means we finally have a working model of temporal evolution where state updates occur only in discrete, energy-backed steps. No one has ever built a physical system that exposes time so transparently.

Because of Gödelian limitations, continuous time can never be falsified from within a universe composed of Planck-scale intervals. Any measurement of time must itself use time, so continuity remains an unfalsifiable assumption. Bitcoin stands apart because it creates its own time rather than measuring a substrate it is embedded in.

This matters because once you observe quantized time in practice, a time-first ontology becomes explicit: physics, space, and all dynamical formalisms emerge after discrete temporal structure is defined. If that architecture is closer to reality than the inherited continuous-time assumption, then much of the current formalism especially in quantum mechanics and computation is describing a mathematical idealization, not physical truth.

I’m not denying the hashing discussion. I’m simply pointing out that Bitcoin is the first system in human history where time is not assumed, but it is constructed from thermodynamics. If that observation is taken seriously, it has deep consequences for how we model the universe and the validity of said threat.

as a physics enjoyer this gobeldygook is just embarrassing. you can't just borrow these terms and build your own deepak chopra-grade physical theory. let's see some actual equations.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sure working on it finalizing a paper.

Objectively would you agree that if time is quantized and discrete, that the formalism of quantum mechanics breaks apart?

Planck units don’t imply a discrete universe. This is a common misunderstanding

Sure, but address the question: *if* time is quantized and discrete, would you agree the formalism of QM breaks down? Yes or no?

Only after addressing that question can we proceed because then this raises the question that how would a discrete and quantized time change our interpretation of Planck Units.

Yes mathematically you can divide them into smaller units, but physically you cannot. Again Bitcoin is showing us what a quantized model of time looks like. Please show me a valid 1/2 of a block of time or a valid 1/10 of a block of time in bitcoin.

I’ll be waiting.

According to chatgibity, quantizing time doesn't break quantum mechanics. It just changes it. Also, given that Bitcoin seems to quantize time in a similar way to a clock, in that it breaks it into discrete units, but not atomic units, I don't see what that has to do with quantum mechanics. There seems to be some bait and switch going on by relying on multiple definitions of the same word.

Uhhh, you cannot take the derivative in Schrödinger equation if time has a fundamental smallest unit.

Please break a block in bitcoin into smaller units of time such that they remain valid on the ledger, I’ll wait.

Blocks are atomic time composed from energy/entropy.