You make good points here, trade offs are very important to understand . The main difference I’m trying to point out is starting off people new to bitcoin with a custodial service is irresponsible, especially when the risks are not truly understood. Something like Phoenix is easy enough that I would personally never risk using WOS but to each their own.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

WoS forgot to highlight this one as well 😁

Yeah cherry picking quotes is a good way to intentionally mislead people. I guess WOS think they are not a financial institution 😉

🤷‍♂️

i got confirmation just a bit ago. phoenix does NOT support lnurls (incoming) yet...

"

Creating a LNURL address is not supported yet on Phoenix. It will come in a later version (ETA is a few months). However you can still pay these addresses from Phoenix."

sticking with WoS for now for newbies and zappability.

PSA: when you see your sats level getting impressive, transfer what you don't want to risk losing to a wallet you have keys for!

-Not your keys, not your coins-

Phoenix does not support paying to samuel@bitcoinstr.us Breez does. Just fyi.

phoenix will SEND to a lnurl, but no recieve or way to generate the lnurl (yet).

Great just confirmed it does work! Thanks #phoenix

One more question. I noticed you are using fountain.fm, is there any reason you are not using phoenix, muun, (my favorite Breez), Zeus, or some other self custody wallet? I am ASSUMING fountain.fm is custodial.

1. The LNURL-pay protocol is complex for most. Requires the dynamic on the fly creation of a payment address.

2. WOS keeps open 100,000,000,000 mSat channels, so does fountain.fm

3. #Nostr is going to introduce millions of people to Bitcoin (really SATS and #zaps) teaching them the principles of, Hot (billfold), Warm (checking account), Cold (hardware, multi-sig, air-gap) is far more important.

4. Fees