I'm not even replying to this effrontery.

*Please ignore this message!!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ooooo now I’m gonna read his note like a 100 times

Random thought: You ever hear the etymology of English to be said that it’s a derivation from “Angel-ish” as in Angelic? Seems arrogant if true, or possibly demonic.

Is England actually Marie Jois from One Piece? Are you guys who Oda is representing with the Celestial Dragons? Cant get it out of my head since I saw a video of “How the queen eats a banana”

Lost me on second bit, I've only seen the live action show. The rest is interesting if true

Yeah live action isn’t quite there yet to introducing them. But basically they are the pompous slave traffickers of the world because of their noble/holy bloodline, and they are the reason for the World Government’s existence.

Sounds British and Dutch to me ✅

I don't even know where to begin, in picking all this apart. So I'm simply not even going to bother🤦🏻‍♂️😂.

That’s fair enough. But seriously a knife and fork for a banana? and the way they say bah-nah-nah …. Spooky

Ang-lish as in anglo-saxon.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary on the etymology of the term Anglo-Saxon came later:

“The term was first used in the early 1600s, with the earliest known use recorded in 1602.”

“Angle

4 of 4

noun (2)

An·​gle ˈaŋ-gəl

: a member of a Germanic people that invaded England along with the Saxons and Jutes in the fifth century a.d. and merged with them to form the Anglo-Saxon peoples”

This is as far back as I can find with

Miriam Webster. And then this from some random site:

“A famous anecdote, though likely apocryphal, recounts Pope Gregory the Great mistaking the blond, blue-eyed Angles for angels, saying "Non Angli, sed angeli" ("Not Angles, but angels"), which highlights the phonetic similarity between "Angles" and "angels" but does not imply a shared etymology.”