Let’s imagine we’re living 30 years ago and going around trying to explain to people how email will change the world. Who would even care? We could even tell them how to set it up, but that would be pointless too. However, if during collaboration we mention that we’ll send the info via email and act like they’re Neanderthals for not knowing what it is… maybe after a few iterations, they’ll start getting interested. I remember many companies trying to figure out how to make a website—just so they wouldn’t fall completely behind.

We should approach bitcoin adoption the same way. Don’t explain anything—just require bitcoin for collaboration.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

this is the way—offer a product that normies want and accept bitcoin only

nostr:nevent1qqsgux6mxtqluqj20u3j9tum4vkzhmnezk0z3wse4chz69da30fmlscprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9ukqja9wd7

Perfect analogy. It especially hits when trying to explain the utility of stablecoins, tokens, or smart contracts to someone who only sees crypto as a store of value.

It's trying to explain why a DEX is better because you hold your own keys and don't need to trust a company, or how decentralized lending is more transparent and can't just freeze your funds, to someone whose only metric is "number go up." Their framework is digital gold, but we're talking about a digital economy.

You can't explain why digital cash (~stablecoins) is better for a coffee than a gold bar - you just have to pay with it :)

we did some zap tests on this note… your profile only specifies a nip05 nostr address, but not a lightning address, so we tried to zap your nip05 address.... we made six attempts to⚡zap this note, at tree@tree.fail, over a period of 5 minutes. in each case, we found that your lightning address service or server did not respond correctly. if you wanted to fix this... you could try getting a free rizful lightning address -- https://rizful.com ... if u get it set up, pls reply here so we can do this ⚡zap test again.