Hereโ€™s how I think about it:

If a couple has two kids, they only replace themselves after they die.

If they have three, there is a โ€œprofitโ€ of one. Population wise, this would likely be canceled out by couples having no or one child, but itโ€™s still growth in the context of that nuclear family. Thatโ€™s my baseline goal as far as number of kids.

I was an only child so my stretch goal is four or more if I can. I probably wonโ€™t be able to have more than three, though. Iโ€™m not too tore up about it; Iโ€™m more focused on enjoying and doing the best for whatever number of children Iโ€™m blessed with.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This is beautiful Eryn ๐Ÿซ‚๐Ÿซ‚๐Ÿ’œ and totally agree xx will be grateful if I can even get one baby ๐Ÿซ‚ also the process will be really fun ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿซ‚

Good baseline, but there are other tragedies to consider.

Anything that causes death before those kids can grow up and have families of their own. Accidents, sickness, etc.

Not fun to think about it, but part of the math.

3-5 seems like a healthy minimum just from the perspective of maintaining the population.

โ€œToo many children? That is like saying there are too many flowers.โ€

-Mother Teresa