Yeah, but they don't need to be kind. They can just adjust to my tone. I didn't even know there are certain figure behind "SAIF" or whatever that is. Good that you've finally named names. And actually, I'm more concerned about the expression itself. Why invent a new word for it, form a group behind it, when it's really nothing more than timeless Islamic ethics?
These are valid questions from recent observations. I do hope SAIF takes the feedback and adresses it kindly cause they are bleeding OG follows atm.
I came to nostr originally due to recommendations from nostr:npub175nul9cvufswwsnpy99lvyhg7ad9nkccxhkhusznxfkr7e0zxthql9g6w0 and nostr:npub1chmhgx9nwxdpwv6jj6qs257fwzrhtsjh2egvyvqq3rmzfy8cd5fq4nr4y5 and this was two years ago. I completed my hirja here before ever reading a SAIF article or knowing about Eco and the "joycat" wing. I was not an accelerationist until even about nine months ago (again, thanks entirely to IM posts here on nostr).
A few months back nostr:npub1cyszsghzdpyl9el987y9v53mz9yq2kh6xmjdhkkw6ehkf78m5fzs8n7zym graciously invited me to join a SAIF aligned group chat and it was a wonderful experience to connect more and nostr:npub1jztpxpucq97dt6vt6wlh7czzxuahvaxn7pv0waea7yrkf5j7u9tspm9j4q was particularly helpful in working through some theory with me.
To my knowledge SAIF's endorcement of nostr has not been disavowed and I personally maintain husn al dhan toward all of SAIF. Recent moves have significantly raised doubt regarding intent and as any muslim knows, intent is paramount. To be clear, I have reached out to many from SAIF core via a few channels now and nostr:npub1la035xtyf47xj4yw5c0nz2vcaze8anjzun9u3hjepqzlwla79ztqfe6dx7 has been the only one to provide any clarification. I will leave this post as an opportunity for him or another from core to kindly respond publically as that seems both appropriate and necessary at this point. nostr:note127grtg0mfu8ec5zm22qwkchahsu2xxcu4ykjax53q3z4vkfqwhpsqamcx0
Discussion
No replies yet.