Not at all. The entire concept of government is illogical and evil. No man has a right to your money or labor.
https://video.nostr.build/4ea168f6cf963bed49cfad736cb12960fb890f66f2cbde2c0f3a7e9117455b1b.mp4
Discussion
Governments existed before fiat money and involuntary taxes. This is why no one takes libertarians seriously and why they are political losers
That’s a fallacy. Just because it existed for a long time, doesn’t mean it’s good or necessary lmao don’t be a cuck there is no winning in politics
How is pointing out a fact a fallacy? Who said government is good or necessary?
Feel free to argue me and not the straw man
Yeah ross being free is a total L
Moving the goalposts was the fallacy!
You changed the subject to be about libertarians being political losers and that government has existed before when I was talking about the illegitimate nature of government. Try to stay on topic.
Ross went to prison for what 14 years?
Who put him in prison? Who controls the prison? Who put the samourai team in prison? The root of the problem is the government. Ross is free now but why isn’t the samourai team free yet? And again why didn’t trump pardon him before?
Political bribery isn’t a good thing 😂
yes which is why the american contract left ZERO room for that AS LONG as the sheep remained vigilant in their DUTY.
taxes remain illegal and only applicable to "employees" of the federal government engaged in what is termed "trade or business" WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
which highlight the original delegated powers which were EXCLUSIVELY for dealing with foreign states and other international dealings....
the fact that your fathers and grandfathers chose potbellies, alcohol, and football over education, investment, civic duty and maintaining their LEGAL STATUS and the government's SUBSERVIENT role says more about your genetic heritage than it does the proper role of government.
It's not illogical to form a team to protect a people's interests.
While the Libertarian critique of the institution of the state does have some valid points when viewed through the materialistic lens of property rights, it does not account for game theory law of the jungle power dynamics posed by competing nations that have organized themselves into nation-states.
The difference is that the formation of teams to protect your interests is voluntary.
Well, maybe at first it is, but later as organization at the societial level plays out, and larger national "super tribes" are formed, it all depends on your view of how "voluntary" the exit costs are I suppose.