i dont even know what to say
ayn rand is for losers
in a very different way than blink 182 is for losers
the latter is acceptable and actually super cool and hot
the former is like: oh ok so white supremacy
Discussion
what im saying is:
if you say you listen to blink 182
no one on this earth is gonna say you have great taste except another blink fan
there is zero punk cred here
it is lame across the board
you can try to be like: im a drummer and i follow travis and his work across all his bands
and fair. but sketch.
certainly couldnt say that about tom or mark
i mean, as a super deep cut you can
if you went to berklee you can
my brother can
his friends can
actual musicians and sound engineers can
that is a separate thing tho
i was speaking generically
what do i mean by can? like what is can/cant
conversationally falling out
if the point of a conversation is to stay
in
for two people or a group to enjoy it
rallying like tennis
cant is too far out or too niche
anyway, conversely
ayn rand has been used to hurt people
ayn rand is for losers (derogatory forever)
ayn rand is for teenagers who are mad at their mom
especially boys
which, ok, fair
but there is literally r/antinatalism2
(a great subreddit whether pro or anti family honestly. like very much does everyone owe it to the unborn to read the testimony of people who do not feel like they are here consensually)