Replying to Avatar AU9913

Everyone has such nuanced perspectives on this it's great to hear. As a software developer myself almost exclusively vibe coding for the past 2 months, here are my thoughts.

I was able to be productive with one hand. Since I had twins, I had an infant in my arms for 75% of the time since they were born, but was still able to create things while doing that.

Llms are JV. They will not replace senior engineers, but they do take the place of a jr dev, the same way they take the place of a paralegal. Organizations still need to hire those rolls to train people up, but one man shops can get 80% of the way to the solution faster.

We still live in a fiat world where time to market is important, so getting a quick and dirty project out the door is highly valuable to determine whether or not your idea has a market or if you're just building a tool for yourself. Building tools for yourself vs others is dramatically different way of coding. Once you e determined a project has value outside of your hands, you can spend time and money honing it.

The chat based ui for llms is not going to enhance products. I'm building a tool called vibe check, where you have your typical kanban workflows. Having llms work off of cards or issues will yield much better results that stupid chats. Especially if I get to the point where I can have specialized agents for certain functions (a QA agent, a security minded agent, a ux designer, a test automation agent, etc) then you can have work more fully fleshed out, then have a human in the loop review it and request changes before having the coder (agent or human) go back and make changes. This is how agile development has worked in the industry. Like imagine a user story that when it gets to the done column has been fully QAd, is deemed secure, has good design, etc and there isn't coordination required between so many people, just one human coder? Enhancing a good programmer with a security/QA/devops/designer will allow teams to augment their skills until they have time or money to develop their team or org to hire people with those skills

I would try this, sounds very interesting

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

yeah the vibe kanban thing is a great idea

I like this idea.

I’ve seen someone running like 4 teams of AI, each team with 3-4 agents to achieve specific goals. Almost like how a company would be structured.

I don’t know if that is really needed in that way, but I find it very interesting. Where you will have a QA team, planning team, front end team? Infra teams. Not exactly, but you know what I mean.

Hi all. See VibeKanban.com - it's a Kanban style multi-agent orchestrator that sits atop Claude or Codex. I picked it up on Monday and am overjoyed. It's great.

looks dope

So dope. Dopest

This is really cool. I've used it for a couple hours today and it might just be the tool I've been needing. I'm not organized enough to be a project manager, and I have a very one-track mind, which makes running multiple branches of a project really hard for me. This helps me avoid forgetting what's going on and allows me to clean stuff up when I'm done. Awesome.

Moo

Yeah haha my whole family was wandering around asking "what is that noise from?" all day

Glad you like it. I can't remember who referred me to it but I owe that person a case of beers.

Lol this is sick. Maybe I can abandon my project now or fork this one to just use ngit and kanbanstr. Maybe the nak MCP upgrades I make will just plug and play

Awesome