Replying to twofish

The irony is that what nostr:nprofile1qqsq9k04vahllseell55m74n3047y88pzlr0z5yany32st29fapqmgsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgawaehxw309ahx7um5wghxy6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctc87ckyu did a few months ago is and will continue to proliferate, and bitcoin will continue on succeeding and you will never know the significance of the change.

Twofish, do you think the 'fix' for the opreturn issue is already fixed by ocean?

Is there no real issue the chain will split if Core eliminates the limit, and the option to limit at all?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The op return issue has nothing to do with what ocean did. You would know this if you knew what ocean did.

I assumed you knew, which is why I asked. I'm interested in learning.

The announcement of DATUM at time 1:08:00 in the video on YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IqkrGMWPIY

This is a short clip of it:

https://video.nostr.build/3145ff31df805a263355a337008bcc71064ac814a11c83505d96fe3b722dc30e.mp4

Your question is a symptom of abstract power projection which hints at Jack's original statement. This debate is about abstract power alignment. The rhetoric around the debate is noise. The signal is what ocean did. The action. What ocean did.