Maxis and LN network enjoyors like to fud #monero supply guarantees .

they neglect to mention there are *regularly* exploits found on LN that effect users access to their funds

if not outright make it possible for them to be stolen.

If we're actually honest

the Pedersen commitments that guarantee Monero supply are better understood and tested than any LN implementation.

if #bitcoin ers are actually going to argue that increased complexity is a nonstarter,

you should trust monero more than LN.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Still stuck on this monero premined shitcoin with infinite supply? lol

Btw it's a complete nonsense to compare layer 1 and layer 2

there goes another LN bot

tell that to nostr:npub1yxp7j36cfqws7yj0hkfu2mx25308u4zua6ud22zglxp98ayhh96s8c399s

also

there was no monero premine.

and at any point in time you know how much monero is in circulation. how is that "infinite?"

Tail emission forever makes it infinite over time

is that infinite supply in the room with us right now?

no its not. and it never will be.

an acceptable answer is

"as time approaches infinity, supply also approaches infinity"

but that isnt "infinite supply"

hard facts,

today monero is more scarce than Bitcoin.

and for the rest of your life, the buying power of your Bitcoin will be degraded from supply inflation.

Does it matter if it's L1, L2 or L42 if your money gets rugged in an exploit?

Monero wasn't premined. Maybe learn what you're talking about first and you'll at least seem credible.

“Forgive ‘em lord they don’t know what they say”