If true, it's so weird. Unless I'm just blind to something. Cathie wood always mentions Solana.

I understand if they think it's a plug and play tokenized stock market that could trade 24/7 afor anyone with a smart phone. But I don't understand why they would want to invest in any of the "tokens" which are just printed out of thin air.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

the oracle problem exists not just for shitcoin tokens but stock markets are also stuck with this problem, how can you trust a thing that is supposed to bind to something limited in the real world?

But you can’t fix a shitcoin problem with another shitcoin 😂

yeah, that's the point, they aren't solving a problem, that's how you know the real use case is fleecing suckers

It's always a jurisdictional thing. Perhaps it's just to trick people into thinking the tokens are somehow bound to the real world. people in other countries definitely seem to be very willing to trust these tokens.

i wonder if they are trying to compete with the one company that currently holds all the stock certificates. So best good faith case, these people are trying to disrupt the already centralized old company with a fresher(perhaps more tech savvy) new company?

But I just don't see how anyone could trust a company built around a shitcoin. Unless the founder is honest about the mission and the risks. And that it's not Bitcoin that people are buying but a share of a company.

They’re all shitcoiners. Even his wife made a shitcoin.

nostr:note1vu8nklkl80pr6repqxywwkkgn5ecp6v3rn974m3yswttwgz5jnvsxpa46a