Discussion
I’m not sure everyone should be blindly trusting RFK. He did say in the early days of covid that vaccines should be mandatory and anyone who doesn’t believe in climate change should be put in prison.
My guess is, he’ll pull in some big numbers then conceding to a more prominent Dem leader, who ever that may be.
It’s a Psyop to stop influential democrats crossing the isle
Source?
https://theweek.com/speedreads/445746/robert-f-kennedy-jr-wants-law-punish-global-warming-skeptics
Hmm I can’t seem to find his early vaccination comments, but I defiantly read an article on it. Will accept it was fake news as I can’t source it again
Whether he said that or not (I haven’t looked it up) we shouldn’t be blindly trusting anyone. Least of all politicians.
I know this is going to sound confrontational, but not every thing you disagree with is a “psyop”
I too think you are probably right about this assumption. The Deep State always plays these games to keep people guessing and also divided.
Already saw a Kennedy 2024 bumper sticker ✊
Can’t win with a voice like that
Have you ever voted for a republican? If no, what are the biggest policy blockers?
Kennedy is an opportunist who lost any credibility by his anti-science, anti-vaccine crusade.
😅 Anti science
Kennedy and Gabbard would be one helluva ticket.
Which reminds me, we need to bring Tulsi to Nostr.
Tulsi should be top of any ticket
100%; I've been thinking this might be the appetizer for it as well.
I thought Tulsi left the Demoncats?
>From: (johnny) at 05/11/23 10:18:24 on wss://relay.damus.io
>---------------
>I thought Tulsi left the Demoncats?
the video is an excellent summary, reasonable and interesting. whatever the outcome of the actual election cycle, he will elevate the conversation. "the answer isn't less talking - it's more talking" and "the constitution was made for difficult times". that's clear. rfkjr make a fantastic vp in the short term should that be an separate outcome. his visibility will help shape the narrative - robustly, i believe. hopefully he's in this situation by choice - not by force.
on a more theoretical note: online voting and running is a illusionary choice mechanism, primarily designed to collect data and build profiles. the same with choosing union partnerships - people's choice is also an illusion. individuals should select partnership freely regardless of their status, wealth, power, or fame. no one should or be able to shadow obstruct personal choice for profit.
He has as much of a chance of winning the Democratic nomination as Ted Cruz.
Don't trust him
I'm not used to democrats actually making sense. I was expecting nonsense. That's not what I heard.
>From: JackDorsey at 05/09/23 18:59:44 on wss://relay.nostriches.org
>---------------