Deliberately lying isn't "better".

Financial planners are looking after themselves so not surprised and google search online became such garbage after implementing AI into its search.

Ok these guys are retarded.

Holding Bitcoin does not provide a passive income like owning a business and you don't start a business as an asset you start a business because you are interested in that field or talented in that field or want to provide something to your community to fill a niche.

And a scooter is not an asset you invest in, it's personal transportation. Vehicles are not assets they are liabilities.

If you want a car to retain value you don't drive it, and you pay to store it somewhere safe, etc.

That's not an asset.

And you don't fucking buy land to make money selling it that's stupid way of thinking and everything that's wrong with the world.

You buy land so that you can have somewhere for yourself and your family in the future, so you can use it to grow crops or raise livestock and make an income.

Like a painting is an asset because looking at it does not depreciate its value

Vehicles are built to be used and using them creates wear and tear.

Anyone that thinks the way these guys think should not be the ones you look to or boost.

Like shit. You buy a house so that you don't have to pay rent. So that you have more control over your living environment, so you can provide somewhere for your family to live.

This idea of housing being something that only exists to make a profit from is completely retarded.

And trying to compare owning a house to having money is retarded.

Bitcoin is money. A house is somewhere you can live.

Food is something you eat.

You can make an income providing food or housing to other people, you can make an income by trading stocks and investments.

Holding something doesn't make an income.

Owning a house or land that's not being used for anything, and then selling it later on to profit isn't just socially stupid but it's economically short sighted fiat minded thinking.

You can use land to make food.

You can use Bitcoin to buy the food.

You can use a house to live in.

You can use Bitcoin to buy a house.

I don't understand why it's so hard for podcast bros to grasp these ideas

This is literally how shitcoin investors think.

Bitcoin isn't about getting rich.

Bitcoin is just money, good money that won't devalue because it can't be printed infinitely.

Dollars pounds euros etc. are shit money, literally based on debt, loaned from private banks to governments with interest that we pay back as taxes while the debt continues to grow.

Bitcoin isn't increasing in value like a stock, even though it appears that way.

The increase in value to Bitcoin is purely coming from it's adoption as money and that increase in value is much smaller than the value of Bitcoin vs fiat.

What's actually happening is that fiat currency is devaluing.

The getting rich by holding Bitcoin is just a side effect of the other money being based on debt and having no limits.

Holding Bitcoin itself is like saving money, it's like having a pile of cash in a safe if you're using self custody wallet, or having money in the bank if you're using a custodial wallet.

The savings just doesn't devalue over time.

Land value goes up when the land is improved or when the value of neighbouring lands go up because of development or whatever.

The price rising doesn't reflect value rising, the price of food going up isn't because the food takes more energy to produce.

Houses are cheaper to build and food is cheaper to produce than it used to be.

The whole "cost of living crisis" is just the debt backed infinitely printable currency losing value.

You buy land and use Bitcoin to escape that shit, not add to it.