does this seem like a bug? when I do a normal close on amethyst, and then open again, tons of these rate limits on the resolver. (graphene, tor features off).
this is cool! will keep testing.
```
2025-08-02 11:09:18.459 13624-16100 Relay rela...bunker.com app_process64 W OnFailure null null Unable to resolve host "relay.nsecbunker.com": No address associated with hostname null
2025-08-02 11:09:18.460 13624-19995 Relay relay.pleb.to app_process64 W OnFailure null null Unable to resolve host "relay.pleb.to": No address associated with hostname null
2025-08-02 11:09:18.461 13624-20533 Relay wot.sovbit.host app_process64 D OnOpen (ping: 422ms)
2025-08-02 11:09:18.461 13624-18075 SHA256Pool app_process64 W Pool running low in available digests
2025-08-02 11:09:18.462 13624-16059 Relay aegis.relayted.de app_process64 D OnOpen (ping: 371ms)
2025-08-02 11:09:18.463 847-22642 resolv netd E Query from 10187 denied due to limit: 256
2025-08-02 11:09:18.463 847-22642 resolv netd E GetAddrInfoHandler::run: from UID 10187, max concurrent queries reached
2025-08-02 11:09:18.464 847-22646 resolv netd E Query from 10187 denied due to limit: 256
2025-08-02 11:09:18.464 847-22646 resolv netd E GetAddrInfoHandler::run: from UID 10187, max concurrent queries reached
2025-08-02 11:09:18.464 847-22652 resolv netd E Query from 10187 denied due to limit: 256
2025-08-02 11:09:18.464 847-22652 resolv netd E GetAddrInfoHandler::run: from UID 10187, max concurrent queries reached
```