Continued with book of Genesis so far, don't see why it wouldn't be compatible with whatever you're trying to do 🤙
Discussion
I won't be linking to any original sources in wiki pages, as I don't want to encourage people to edit or troll the content of sources. A source is simply a source, and should be shelf-stable. I don't need 15 variations of the same verse from the same version. They should all be the same, and then there's no point in wikifying them.
I'm going to put original texts into articles and create books out of the articles, and then link to the books or the articles.
But you can do it however you like. 🤷♀️
An uncensored, decentralized wiki will eventually mirror all the text content in circulation.
As for me, having my fingerprint on it might help Christians see I don't hate them if I ever get infamous for getting some number of people to switch to a UNIX epoch calendar or something
I agree that it will, especially as someone could just generate pages automatically, out of everything printed in existence, but that doesn't mean I have to use them.
The Internet is full of things I don't look at.
Also consider the benefit of being able to just add double square brackets to terms to link to the wiki pages for them for a wiki version of the bible
The wiki link would have to follow the Biblical standard notation, for that to help.
People who really care about Biblical/Quran/etc. content are fastidious about versioning and trusted sources.
I mean like, for Moses for example you could just add square brackets to his name and have it link to an article about him. And for old timey terms people need explained.
When there are entries with page names in biblical standard notation, that will of course be useful on another level
I plan to leave my kjv thing unfinished for a while btw because there are a lot of Christians out there and maybe it being half finished on the wiki will inspire someone to start using the wiki for the first time to finish it. Onboarding with the power of god