To maintain purchasing power, best case scenario, you have to beat out the "risk free rate." Of course, it isn't actually risk free, so you have to go further than that in reality. And then, on top of that, you have to gain purchasing power to afford your sandwich, indefinitely, with a 95% guarantee, that is, with almost no risk at all.
What you're essentially saying is that bitcoin is immune to risk. You're describing a perpetual motion machine.
I'm not saying that. I'm talking about probabilities and historical performance.
You're talking about a >95% guarantee of a 2% average monthly return on something indefinitely, on capital that isn't producing economic output. On top of that, it's just chatgpt telling you that. I'm just pointing out that one ought to be highly skeptical of such a claim.
At best, bitcoin can preserve purchasing power indefinitely. In the short term, it can siphon wealth off late adopters as hard money, or give the older a cantillion effect like benefit in times of population growth. It cannot (and nothing short of a fleet of robots that make you everything you desire and maintain their own fleet can) preserve it's purchasing power and give you an additional return, especially not of 24% annually (ignoring compounding for simplicity) indefinitely.
"indefinitely" may have been a bit too strong of a word.
a couple things:
chatgpt ran a bunch of Monte Carlo simulations at my direction and the math looked legit. It wasn't just saying stuff.
I think you may be discounting deflation?
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
