# HERE'S AN IDEAL
##### All human interactions should be voluntary.
*In the comments finish this sentence:*
It's okay to violently force my will upon another person when...
# HERE'S AN IDEAL
##### All human interactions should be voluntary.
*In the comments finish this sentence:*
It's okay to violently force my will upon another person when...
Pigs fly
... they have previously tried to force their will upon me.
never. it is ok to respond to those who use violent force in order to control you, but only insofar as it stops the use of force against oneself.
It's interesting that not one person has yet made an argument for an involuntary human interaction.
Where did you pro-State people go?
It really is not that there is never a time for violent coercion.
I used to ask potential new hires, "What is a good reason to be late for work?”
"None", many would instantly respond. But that wasn't true. If someone got in a car accident or if they were waylaid by highwaymen that might be acceptable. So their answers would suggest if applicants could discern the difference between good reasons and bad ones.
Back to coercion...
It's okay to coerce behavior when they are violating your rights.
Some examples:
If they break into your house...
If they try to take your life...
If they are stealing your property...
If they try to lock you in a cage...
It seems to me patriots, law abiding citizens, and other statists are incapable of making such clear distinctions. They advocate for violence when the State insists on violating human rights.
...they asked for it by aggressing against my loved ones.
Does that work? 🤔