As a non American it still baffles me every time I hear someone try to justify the right to bear arms while missing the whole context of the amendment; the population of the US are no longer well regulated militia.
It’s not like all other western democracies have failed because their citizens don’t have the right to own a gun.
The amendment had its place in time but it’s no longer relevant in a civilised democracy.
It affords an American a means of protection and self defense.
If anything I think the right to bear arms is more important against a government with professional soldiers than a military force composed of ordinary citizens.
Also the Second Amendment was not solely about the existence of a well-regulated militia; it also emphasized the right of the people to keep and bear arms for the exact situation the US is about to face. This right is essential for individual self-defense, protection against tyranny, and the preservation of freedom.
While it's true that other Western democracies have different approaches to gun control, i suppose it’s important to consider the unique characteristics of each country's history, culture, and legal system. What works in one country may not necessarily work in another, although I see many axe attacks, knife attacks, acid attacks … in other countries so I’m not sure they are “much safer” without guns.
I should also add that the presence of the Second Amendment has not led to the failure of the United States as a civilized democracy. Instead, it reflects a fundamental belief in the importance of individual rights and liberties, which are central to the fabric of American society.
The Second Amendment is extremely relevant today, it serves as a safeguard against government overreach and ensures that individuals have the means to protect themselves and their loved ones in an increasingly uncertain world.
It is possible that the US government understands shit is falling apart and before it’s fully out of control they encourage chemical foods, toxic water, and hella pharmaceuticals … all in hopes that it disrupts homes, causes major chemical imbalances and leads to school shootings, then greater fears unlocked and boom Americans beg to have their guns taken away (this is the only way to remove guns because if they just say, “hey we want to remove guns” people will ask why) just in time for shit to hit the fan and then when the citizens realize what’s happening they can not revolt.
To disarm the people...[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason
But he said that over 200 years ago. Back then you were lucky if you could fire 3 shots a minute with a riffle. Weapons were different now and so is the governance of the entire country. Just because something used to be true doesn’t mean it will always be true.
What I hear when people argue for the right to bear arms is
“I don’t care how many mass shootings there are, I don’t care how many children die; It’s more important that everyone has the right to carry a gun just in case at some point in the future we need to overthrow the government.”
Yeah and the US government is not the same as it was 300 years ago, their military goals and equipment are also not the same as they used to be 300 years ago so thank goodness we have more than just a rifle to defend ourselves.
Did you read the last part of what I previously wrote?
“It is possible that the US government understands shit is falling apart and before it’s fully out of control they encourage chemical foods, toxic water, and hella pharmaceuticals … all in hopes that it disrupts homes, causes major chemical imbalances and leads to school shooting, then greater fears unlocked and boom Americans beg to have their guns taken away (this is the only way to remove guns because if they just say, “hey we want to remove guns” people will ask why) just in time for shit to hit the fan and then when they realize what’s happening they can not revolt.”
It’s literally talking about this “I don’t care..” comment you just made. I do care, I care a lot and I understand how as well as why many of these school shooting happen. If you are not a US citizen and not living through this you might not see the image as clear. But I ask you to re read the last part and re consider “what if those words are true.”
I don’t argue that every person should have a gun. I argue that every mentally healthy person, who has proper training, and proper security is allowed this right.
I am pro freedom, but with freedom comes responsibility. Some people don’t want responsibility put on them and those are usually the ones that stick with a bank because it’s easier than having to be responsible for 12-24 words. Nothing wrong with it, but it’s just not my cup of tea.
I am pro freedom- I did not get vaccinated, but I was responsible and did not eat any processed sugars or carbs for 2 years (2020-2022).
I am pro freedom - I support the second amendment, but I have proper training, I am mentally and physically fit, and I have proper storage / safety precautions.
… I think you get my point.
Honeybees kill more Americans than (non-government) mass shooters. So do swimming pools.
And yet civilians can own "assault pools" and "insects of mass pollination". Good luck to anyone using their assault pool to deter the security forces from supporting a dictator...
Extremely valid points 👌✅
