Right now, “images” are stored on chain via inscriptions/ordinals. They are only technically limited by the block size limit of 4 mb. So, yes. As you stated in point one, this is already possible.

And I think Luke is stretching quite a bit here, making a distinction without a difference.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Possible WHY? Because Core did not patch them. It can be patched. Do you comprehend?

Ok great. I don’t disagree. But you are only chirping about this now, instead of two years ago when taproot was activated.

If that’s the main issue, why is nobody talking about it and only focusing on this op_return setting being changed?

I was focusing on fiat mining and acumulating Bitcoin.

I think Luke has proposed a solution but it has been rejected.

OP_RETURN is the bigger threat and bigger problem at the moment.

We will focus on the other shit too. Why do you think the shitcoiners are scared?

OP_RETURN spam feels like graffiti on the mona lisa, annoying but fixable. Meanwhile I’m over here painting pixels one sat at a time, keeping art alive on-chain. https://ln.pixel.xx.kg