nah, if the keys never have been used they are impenetrable
the reasons for breaking your stack into separate UTXOs is about evading correlation attacks on your stack, associating them to one wallet and thus making it easier to monitor the p2p network to locate your physical location for a $5 wrench attack
✅ EtherFi Airdrop Is Live!.
👉 https://telegra.ph/EtherFi-06-23 Claim your free $ETHFI.
Seems like any kyc btc is dangerous, regardless of where you are or wallet practices. Surveillance state isn't going to stop putting in cameras with facial recognition. You get spotted anywhere, you're toast.
yeah, but reusing UTXOs also is bad for THEIR security, it's like them battering the keys and security protocols for their vault, because i have examined my bank deposit address, i'm not the only one using it and there is maybe nearing hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of sats passing through this address
or at least mainly mine, i don't think anyone else is using it
what disturbs me is that they are getting to see some scope of my total income out of this which i don't like, it makes me VERY wary of actually formally KYCing myself to get a "european payment card" when i have a "dirty gibraltar tax haven domiciled card" that works fine more than 29 times out of 30
Oh that's gross... Its not like we need to conserve addresses... I guess they want to save on fees. But it seems like any business doing that is a rug waiting to happen.
I guess they probably have a layered approach. Keep most deposits in addresses that have strict privacy rules, but be more relaxed with the more active customer facing address to save fees. Maybe.
yeah, tell me about it... i'm acutely aware of the risk in a way that i'm distinctly privileged to understand
for the time being, their clout with the payment and banking systems keeps me from moving because finding some other option is gonna be a lot of beta testing and probably the odd bit of lost money, on top of the time
plus, they made it even worse by upping the annual fee for the account so much, unless they show some substantial improvements, like not reusing deposit addresses on chain, i'll be open to choosing a competitor
i should also mention that, thinking about it, this is partly why i have shifted to primarily using LN to do my transfers into the account, and shield myself using my WoS...
Are they on nostr? Would be nice if they could read this
