Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Reed

Honest question, as I understand it OP_RETURN isn't being removed, the OP_RETURN size limit is being removed (is that true?). If so, wasn't OP_RETURN was specifically designed to be easily pruneable? So why wouldn't people just choose to prune OP_RETURNs from their nodes? Then they wouldn't be "hosting" anything that may get in from this change, right?

nostr:nevent1qqsdujhk59km4uy0k9tgkmpt8g7hm94jfsznnjdjtk9y4ty5xhpcreqzyradv4qv3uha9gt2yhgdstwet5a667ys6s6az6ggfzs2wlfgswjywqcyqqqqqqgprv8k0

Avatar
hi I'm frak 3mo ago

It isn't about storing/pruning unlimited op_returns, it's about relaying that data through the mempool.

Knots:

If I don't want to relay large op_returns I shouldn't have to.

Core:

Relay everything consensus valid

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.