If larger companies create their own clients, but don’t control the underlying identities/data (due to the architecture of the protocol), any non-compliance with the principles can be better served by more open (open source) alternatives… it’s hard for clients to compound value in the same way as they historically have when everything is dependent on DNS

even email, originally an open protocol, has the addressing/datastore tied to initial conditions which allow for larger companies to capture/extract/centralize

such initial conditions (“my account”, “my service”) are structurally non-committed and hence more decentrzlied here