I'm speaking generally about the tendency of those to level criticism our way to lecture us on character, etiquette blah blah blah and in particular, Alp's stance. I'm not talking about you.

Anyway, I can see how you can come to that conclusion but this is just a misunderstanding of the process, what capture means and victory conditions and general SAIF theory. I mean, it's in the name. The primary tool is futurology, hyperstition. Being at the bleeding edge of trends and steering them. With all due respect, what trends do we steer and which people do we capture on Nostr?

Anyway, this has gone for too long. I recommend our reading list and our articles, as well as maybe perusing our tweets. We've been very consistent from the start.

Finally, I can't make it any clearer than this: you need to be able to parse when a core member speaks for SAIF and when they're not. More often than not, they're speaking for themselves. Whether it be sovereign econ or OPSEC or whatever, if you want to live in a Faraday cage then more power to you, you get my repost. But what the project is or isn't, has been consistent and we've been clear on that from the jump.