"[The] sensory judger resonating the most with defending tradition and duty. "
This is a debate between an intuitive perceiver (Time), and a sensory judger (Andrew), which by virtue of their personality design resonate with differing language, the intuitive perceiver resonating the most with what's most true philosophically, and the sensory judger resonating the most with defending tradition and duty. They can derive from the same point, God, but they stylistically have very different approaches to talking about what they believe.
This distinction between general personality types is why certain people "get" Bitcoin (like nostr:nprofile1qyx8wumn8ghj7cnjvghxjmcpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqqg9rg869l7t43ats5gdsqrqh6njn5wjf0jpe0unvpekkredvllr6nqwfmhjz , nostr:nprofile1qyfhwue69uhkcmmrv9kxsmmnwsargwpk8yq3gamnwvaz7tmpv4nkjueww468smewdahx2qpqs05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sgjmwnq ) , and certain people don't get Bitcoin (Peter Schiff). The former are intuitive, and the latter is sensory. Intuitive types are inclined to use conceptual, abstract, technical language and are comfortable with realities they can't see, touch, taste, etc, while sensory types are inclined to used concrete language and are comfortable in a reality that is largely defined by the five senses, and feel uncomfortable with trusting non-concrete, abstract, conceptual, technical language.
Discussion
Tim was completely outclassed. He was unable to comprehend Andrew's questions & arguments.