It’s not this post, that’s for sure

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

yes the virtue signaling flat earther bitcoiners class of 2023 are a better resource than a bitcoin engineer who’s been working on bitcoin since 2010.

Please share some more enlightened posts from them so i can educate myself.

Oh shit he hit the with the "flat earther" 🚭🚭🚭

Well bitcoin engineer since 2010 is still shilling cashu even though its use case is obvious.

Roger Ver was bitcoiner since the same time and now he’s gone rogue.

In any case, please share more information on the OP

i think most people early on got into bitcoin for its non-custodial properties by guy.

apparently not shilling custodial tech is bitcoin class of 2025 now. sad.

s,not shilling,shilling

Well, please inform me how a Bitcoiner from a third world country is supposed to get paid in Bitcoin non-custodially, with a meager wage of 2000 sats per day.

You play with what you have with the least trade off.

Trust the science, what a low effort take lol

you don't need to trust the experts. you just need to read and use your brain for more than 2 cycles.

I requested some reading, what do you recommend?

Thanks. In your view, is the UTXO set the critical resource to protect wrt being able to run a node on modest hardware?

yes, which is why we should not create perverse incentives for people to store data in unproveably unspendable outputs like bare multisig, something which knots proponents are all for apparently.

they think they are doing the right thing but it will most likely just make the problem worse.

Do those options cost a spammer more per byte of spam payload, compared to OP_RETURN?

this was also the nail in the coffin for me recently

nostr:note18hkztahjp3nfle7le06u7wmw9uryyd2quy4m536jtpne7du58kqs9z8gdz

Strange that we come to different conclusions then.