Nostr Web Client

The funding rule of #[0] is that the code must be open source. It is to allow others to access the code, review the code, and distribute the code for free. But the Opensats board will not look at your project code or use your product. They don't use their own rules to review funding applications. They will only reject you based on a piece of GitHub statistical waste paper. This piece of waste paper does not belong to the funding rules. It doesn't matter even if you meet all the funding rules. They just want a piece of waste paper, not the built product and code.

If you like, you can use artificially created beautiful green waste paper to get funding. https://github.com/artiebits/fake-git-history

It doesn't matter what features and code your product has built, and it doesn't matter what users like. You can get funding with a piece of statistical waste paper.

This is not a proof of work for value exchange value, this is shitcoin behavior.

https://opensats.org/apply

nostr:note13als97eewgx5dcmtxqxn2zs299e34tv294qd65dnqmu7p8e0mk8sf875xf

ChipTuner 1y ago

Devils advocate on the stats thing. I think that was more of a lazy way out. It was a quick, yeah it's dead (because most nostr projects are) and never bothered to analyze the project further. The other stupid thing is, I don't push to master until I have a release. My GitHub history looks like I commit once a month meanwhile I'm pushing a few times a day.

Should have sent them your own self-hosted repo so they have to look through the log XD.

The community has been complaining about feedback from those guys for a while. They don't care. If only there was a way to obsolete them, we have lightning, but turns out it's still too much friction.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Moss 1y ago

Yes. The sooner problems are exposed, the better for the Nostr community. Problems should be faced and solved. Transparency and full communication are the way to solve problems.