nostr:npub14k23hl0c7a0ecs42wndgxg4l7w9ve03jtdlg48hvj93zdtq2cf9q3ted68 nostr:npub1unjuck2mx2gck4ww6cmyj9q8ce4lng3qmu59a8nk6h6hrckrm7ls47s8w5

It should be quite easy to monitor him. I agree with the analyst who says this is why PET seems to have done nothing. From a counterespionage point of view expelling spies from an embassy is usually counterproductive because you lose all your data on them and have to work to uncover the new ones who will come, and who may be illegal and hence harder to monitor.

But I'd like to know whether the previous attaché was SVU (information gathering) rather than GRU (thugs).