TL;DR

→ Is Bitcoin's price rise (NGU technology) baked into its DNA?

→ Is it just macro liquidity chasing a speculative asset?

It's a little bit of both!!!

.........................................................................................................................................

I ran the numbers. I tortured the data. I optimized for truth.

R² = 0.964823

That means ~96.5% of Bitcoin's price behavior can be explained by just two things:

Stock-to-Flow (hardwired supply schedule)

Global M2 Liquidity

People love to argue whether Bitcoin's price rises are inevitable or just lucky timing.

I asked a better question:

How close can I come to proving Bitcoin's NGU is hardwired?

What I did:

Started with classic Stock-to-Flow (S2F) → supply-driven scarcity

Shifted from BTC price to Market Cap → better reflection of total valuation

Realized market psychology lags reality → applied a 8-week lag to changes in Global M2

Weighted M2 changes using log1p → big liquidity spikes aren’t linearly felt

Smoothed M2 over 26 weeks → humans digest slowly, FOMO and fear fade over ~half a year

S2F calculated using a 52-week rolling flow → captures true market-perceived scarcity

Lagged S2F by 13 weeks → market digests halvenings slower than Twitter does

The Result:

R² = 0.964823

That means:

~96.5% of Bitcoin's price behavior is explained by S2F and lagged liquidity.

Not speculation.

Not vibes.

Not hopium.

Math. Yeah I probably lost the plot, AMA! 🤣 😂

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

R-squared (R²) Explained:

R-squared, also known as the coefficient of determination, measures the proportion of variance in the dependent variable that's explained by the independent variables in a regression model.

Interpretation of 0.956:

An R² of 0.956 means that approximately 95.6% of the variation in the dependent variable can be attributed to the model's predictors.

Not gonna lie, thought I was going to get some love on this / told I was a total idiot. Over .96 R^2 is not easy to do with anything. Basically proves that S2F drives BTC's engine. The fact that I optimized weights and lags with a million regressions and they amazingly all line up with years and quarters and weeks. It is almost like an incite into human psychology.

No one has come up with an R^2 for BTC over .95. The fact that it is based on S2F and you can project out forever and get tight 8 week out projections every month after M2 global money supply is reported. I mean PlanB's shit don't touch this. He gets a high R^2 using other scarce assets market caps and S2F's trying to gleam incite. If you put them all together you get the group doing this. BTC contributes but isn't the bell of the ball. This is all based off BTC S2F and Gooberments and Central Banks debasing FIAT.

Thought we would do some numbers today. Was excited to be called a retard. Oh well, here is my projection overlaid with M2G out to May 31st with 1st and 2nd Standard deviations. You'all can blow me. Not you nostr:nprofile1qyv8wumn8ghj7enfd36x2u3wdehhxarj9emkjmn99uq3jamnwvaz7tmvd9nksarwd9hxwun9d3shjtnrdakj7qpqvxz5ja46rffch8076xcalx6zu4mqy7gwjd2vtxy3heanwy7mvd7qv0l7c4 , you're cool! 🤣

In simpler terms it's just supply and demand.

Supply: Bitcoin supply.

Demand: USD liquidity.

Everything else is just adjusting for lag and smoothing out.

nostr:nevent1qqsfgeueelfyat2hdhvhalparw644xlzxchhww99dn832w54jfgwrpgppamhxue69uhhxmmvda3k7tnwdspzqj38eme79hvrxrj0yg0trwnalwajn0gvfn9lfptzlamyu4gks8lpqvzqqqqqqyrpp5xe