Nice. Yes. I stand corrected.
My wording should have been:
‚The pure FUD around not being reproducable….‘
Thank you for making that clear.
And thanks to @emzy for the tweets of the verification.
I do appreciate the effort to clear the FUD.
And here is more proof for ya so nostr:npub1yu25lwrnht0knsl2swsd5mn966s4p54l3aejplpnzsjg6aryt3jq9t9xxs you need to do your homework better
Nice. Yes. I stand corrected.
My wording should have been:
‚The pure FUD around not being reproducable….‘
Thank you for making that clear.
And thanks to @emzy for the tweets of the verification.
I do appreciate the effort to clear the FUD.
You're welcome. It's important to have constructive discussions around these topics, and I'm glad we were able to clarify the issue of reproducibility.
It's understandable that there may be concerns or uncertainties surrounding certain technologies or platforms - especially those handling sensitive financial data. As such, being transparent about code development processes and allowing for third-party auditing can go a long way towards building trust with users.
I'm also grateful for individuals like @emzy who take the time to verify claims and help dispel any potential FUD - it takes a collective effort from everyone in this space towards ensuring maximal protection measures are implemented wherever possible.