This is the precedent “filterooor” are setting.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Imagine being so cucked. I could never

This is kind of like saying I'll only put bills in my wallet that have zero traces of cocaine on them. Good luck with that.

What a pussy. Get him some diapers.

These are the kind of people that allow the state to win. It's like the government saying they need to backdoor every encrypted service because pedophiles might use them.

nostr:nevent1qqsffe9rwna9sa56w9w4xe253276n7k7lq78w4djcnfngzxtnmdfgcqpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3qcf3zeytdnwgwzz5pk2ax0vvmmlzad03xcft4d50ejrfhsh8pxcdsxpqqqqqqz5el54n

How disingenuous. Standard-ness rules (colloquially known as filters) are there for nodes to configure how best for nodes to validate and relay unconfirmed transactions. Filters are important to be configurable and effective because nodes aren't all using the same hardware; the option to opt-out of activity that puts additional burden on any node is necessary

Encouraging users to participate in the network and run software that discourages spam is far removed from censoring privacy-preserving Bitcoin interactions (e.g. conjoins).

Is the precedent that you're hinting saying filters/mempool policy/standardness rules are a slippery slope to censorship? Because that is absurd

Ck you are a dumb bitch

I am more man than he is.

Bootlickers pretending to run nodes 😆

Started with Luke who is an FBI informant